top of page
Search

🚨 RTO CEOs – Annual Declaration Compliance Questions

Mar 9
2 min read

I’ve noticed discussion emerging on 3 linked questions on vilification and anti-semitism. What concerns me is not the wording — but the governance implications


These are under Outcome Standard 2.5 Diversity, Inclusion & 2.6 Wellbeing.


1ļøāƒ£ Policy & Code of Conduct Question

Do you have published or readily available a policy or code of conduct for staff or students dealing with vilification, including anti-semitism?

Answer options:

Ā āœ” Yes – staff only

Ā āœ” Yes – students only

Ā āœ” Yes – staff and students

Ā āœ– No

Ā ā“ Unsure


This tests whether your governance framework explicitly addresses discriminatory conduct, specifically on vilification and anti-semitism, plus where it is documented and accessible.


2ļøāƒ£ Leadership Awareness Question

Have you sought any education or information on anti-semitism and thought about the impact of this on the operation of your RTO?

Answer options:

Ā āœ” Yes

Ā āœ– No

Ā ā“ Unsure

This is not about policy - It is about CEO due diligence.


It asks whether you have:

 • Considered cohort risk

 • Reflected on operational impact

 • Exercised governance oversight

Selecting ā€œUnsureā€ signals a lack of executive assurance.


3ļøāƒ£ Your Steps and Approach Question

In line with Outcome Standard 2.5 and 2.6, what steps are you taking to protect students from potential vilification regarding race and religion, including anti-semitism?


This requires a written response.

It moves beyond ā€œDo you have a policy?ā€

It requires evidence of:

• Prevention strategies

 • Awareness initiatives

 • Reporting mechanisms

 • Response procedures

Ā  Cohort wellbeing identification

 • Active monitoring


Under the 2025 Standards, wellbeing is not passive-It must be identified and supported.

These three questions together assess:

āœ” Governance framework

Ā āœ” Leadership awareness

Ā āœ” Operational implementation


Think about it:

Before 31 March, CEOs should ask themselves:

- Do our Codes of Conduct explicitly address vilification?

- Have we identified relevant wellbeing risks within our cohort?

- Are our prevention and response strategies documented and active?

- Could we substantiate our written response if reviewed?


The CEO Annual Declaration is a leadership accountability statement on your formal governance. Can you attest to all the above?


Need reassurance?Ā 


Have you covered this? We have the Policy and Procedure as your solution, Contact us to discuss or review your Diversity Inclusion and Wellbeing strategies.Ā compliance@rtostandards2025.com.au


Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Recent Posts

See All
RTO & GTO ProvidersĀ 

What is place-based approaches and cultural responsiveness in vocational education and training for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander learners? Both students and/or apprentice trainees. NCVER have

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments


Assess Consulting logo – RTO compliance and governance consulting
  • LinkedIn

ABN 74 377 159 755
RTO, CRICOS & GTO Compliance, Audit & Governance Consulting -Australia 

© 2026 Assess Consulting. Assess Governance™ and Governance in Practice™ are trademarks of Assess Consulting. All rights reserved.

Acknowledgement of Country 

Assess Consulting acknowledges Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and recognises the continuing connection to lands, waters and communities. We pay our respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures; and to Elders past and present.
​

bottom of page